Free IELTS Academic Writing Practice Test With Answers & Timer ( Writing Task 1 & Task 2 )
Free IELTS Academic Writing Practice Test Answers Writing Task 1 & Task 2
The Academic Writing test is About 60 minutes long. There are two tasks. Candidates are required to write at least 150 words for Task 1 and at least 250 words for Task 2.
Join Our Membership:-
Subscribe Us On Youtube:- –
Like Us ON Facebook:-
Follow Us on Tiwtter:-
IELTS Academic Task 1
You will be asked to describe some visual information graph – table – chart – diagram and to present the description in your own words. You may be asked to describe and explain data, describe the stages of a process, how something works or write about an object or event. You need to write 150 words in about 20 minutes.
IELTS Academic Task 2 You will be presented with a point of view, argument, or problem. You need to write 250 words in about 40 minutes.
Subscribe For More IELTS ielts writing test task 1 & ielts writing task 2
source
I reckon you should stop background musicš
Thank you mam pls make more videos on academic writing task
Background music so annoying š¤¦āāļø, canāt even concentrate
I thought the sample answers must be in high vocab
Is it difficult to pass Academic IELTS on 6.5 points?
How can you put music track while the timer is on?? Students canāt concentrate š²
Remove the background music and this would be perfect
Pls how do I access to download n print to practice with
This task 2 model answer looks like the writer is blabbing
that "VE ARE" hits so hard hahahahha
More academic writting videos like this pls
Thank you …. from Philippines
I appreciate your effort , but for me it would be better without background music
Thanks for this video.
Can you please review my answers
Task 1:
The two pie charts illustrate spending of a government on Arts in the year 1995 and 2005. In addition, the bar chart depicts the involvement of public in Arts events in the same years.
Overall, it is observed that spending was significantly reduced between 1995 and 2005 on areas like Visual Arts and Music. Whereas funding towards Theatre was almost doubled during these years. Interestingly, we can also see that the corresponding participation of people in these activities was not in synchronization with the funds allocated by the government.
Between 1995 and 2005, spending on Visual Arts and Music saw a drastic drop of around 50% and 30% respectively. During the same time, money spent towards Theatre was almost doubled, while Literature funding was unimpacted.
Looking at the bar-chart representing public involvement in Arts, it is seen that the number of people participating in Visual Arts slightly decreased between the period. On the contrary, rest of the areas show a common trend of an increased involvement, although by a small margin. Of all the areas, Music shows the best results with number of people rising from almost 120,000 to more than 150,000.
Thanks for this vedio
Thanks for this vedio
Thanks for this video
that was very good and thank you very much
The music is not allowing me to concentrate.
Amazing! But its hard to explain. HAHAHA. But aleast we have idea how I do on my exam. Thank you. Daily review. I have 2 months preparation for my final exam. I hoped atleast got 5. Beacause I know its to understand. Wish me luck. Thank you. Cool backgroud musicš¤£
Thanks
succesful asses (essays)
I mean will they ask to write about information from both the pie chart and bar chart for task 1
The line graph illustrates the budget the government dedicates for culture and eduction in the years 1995 and 2005 separetly. From what we can notice, the amounts are slightly altered in some way or another, it has either increased or significantly recuced.
In the year 1995, the goverment spent the most on music, reaching about 150 thousand. Following that is visual arts, staying relatively close at 120 thousand, approximately. The government spent the less for literature in that year.
Years later, in 2005, the amount spent on music didnāt remain the highest, and it was almost equal to theater, which had been way less previously. When comparing the rest, visual arts and literature, they both also kept their difference gap small, barely reaching 20/30 thousand respectively.
To sum up, the government didnāt stay consistent with any statistics throughout the two years.
It is often argued that internet, having changed the way we live and our economy, is the main cause of the weakening of the differences in how the people think and behave. From my prospective, despite being true that the world is more homogenized than before, I believe that there are still deep differences that internet cannot eliminate but, in some case, can also be exacerbated by it.
It is common point of view that internet is accelerating the globalization of the planet and that all the countries and, along with them, the people are becoming very similar one to each other. Even if is true that a lot of individuals are influenced by social media to buy the same products, to dress in the same way or to listen the same music, we should not forget that this thing can be referred mainly to western countries only. There are still other big parts of the planet where internet is not diffused in the same way as in most developed countries, that maintain and defend their local identities, cultural heritages and values. I think that the western countries inhabitants have the propensity to generalize and consider the tendencies and habits within their area as universal for all the planet.
Another thing to take in consideration is that todayās internet, mainly dominated by social networks, is not programmed to eliminate the differences in the way the users think. For instance, social networks have algorithms that foster the creation of eco-chambers of opinions in which people are induced to hear only what they are used to hear, in this way is more plausible than users would spend more time on the platform. Consequently, there are often extreme polarizations in the points of view that increase the differences between parties that have opposite political believes, as recently happened during the Covid-19 pandemic.
In conclusion, I think that is true that internet had speeded up globalization and that numerous people are influenced into acting and thinking in the same way. Nonetheless, I believe that we should not generalize western tendencies to all the planet remembering that there are other parts of the world that seem immune to the globalization so far, furthermore the way social networks work encourages different points of view instead of eliminating them.
Thx for this video mam
Background music is quite annoyingš¤
The task 2 essay is a bad example and will only score about 5. The purpose of the essay is to answer the question '"To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion that internet turns the world into global village where everyone think and behave the same way". There is no response to this question within given essay at all. Although essay is coherent, grammatically right and use good vocabulary, it doesn't answer the question! Instead, author says that internet is a positive step forward and bla bla bla.